Abolish streaming!
Let's have just one common stream, no more labels, no more discrimination, no more stress and everyone will be happy.
Really?
In reality, without streaming, the weaker students are disadvantaged
and the brighter ones penalized. How does a bright child learn at a
faster pace and the weaker one go slower when everyone is thrown into
the same end of the pool?
If you are a swimming coach, you will
not put students of different abilities into the same group. You WILL
separate them into groups according to the level of ability they have
attained. This allows you to design your lessons that enable the
students in each group to make further progress without anyone being
held back.
Education is much like learning how to swim. You group
your students according to their level of proficiency so that the
brighter ones can run on the fast track while the weaker ones can go at a
pace they can manage so that their foundation can be consolidated and
strengthen and THAT gives them a fighting chance to succeed. And you do
want to catch a floundering child as early as possible before he gets
discouraged.
Why stream?
Streaming at primary four was
introduced by Dr Goh Keng Swee in 1980. This followed a comprehensive
review of the education system. At that time, dropout rates and
education wastage were high. Streaming was introduced to reduce dropout
rates by allowing students to learn at their own pace and within their
own capabilities.
With the introduction of streaming, the
education system moved away from a one-size-fits-all system to a system
that creates multiple pathways for students.
Nature does not
endow everyone with the same intelligence, gifts and talents. Therefore
each one of us has our own mountain peak to conquer, not a peak that is
imposed from outside.
A good education system is a diverse
system that caters to the different learning temperaments, abilities and
interests of students, not a rigid system that forces everyone into a
common stream.
That call to remove streaming is a regressive one, well-intentioned by
some and populist in approach by others, is a regressive one
representing a big step backward.
http://on.fb.me/1FEZ9dG
No comments:
Post a Comment